One of my least favorite parts of teaching is the grading process. I wish education as a whole would be more focused on learning and growth over a series of numbers that make up grades. I do feel very fortunate to be teaching in Davison. I believe that the school has made some great strides in fairly assessing students and taking some of the anxiety out of learning and emphasizing mastery of concept. Let me see if I can break down my view on grading so you understand where I am coming from.
Standard Referenced Grading (SRG)
When you run into the term standard referenced grading it refers to Davison's goal of assessing our kids based on the standards found in the Common Core and the Michigan State Standards. It simplifies the amount of things that we need to assess and targets the most important items. Standard referenced grading targets mastery of the final topic instead of looking at an average of scores done on the work while learning.
3, 2, 1...4?
Under SRG, we have adopted a 3, 2, 1, 4 system. Students in elementary school earn a three for showing proficiency on an assignment or an assessment. We might consider this an 80-100% on a traditional grading scale. A two is earned by understanding the majority of the concept, but falling short of proficiency (60-79%.) A one would fall short of that and show the need for major reteaching.
We award fours only in cases where students are working a grade level above where they should be and are still showing proficiency. I do not award many fours in the CAP program because in many cases we are already working a year ahead of schedule. In math for example, I rarely award fours because I take any extra time after proficiency to work with students on concepts that aren't under my standards but will help them on the STAR test and in future years.
Mastery vs. Repetition
The other major part of our grading philosophy in Davison is our focus on mastery of concepts. Our daily work is important because it gives us a chance for independent practice and it informs me in my instruction. I get to see who needs some extra attention and when I need to re-explain something to the whole class. That being said, our grades are based on the final assessments for each topic and ultimately are dependent on the student being able to demonstrate they can achieve the objective.
In a traditional grading situation a student who scored 50, 50, 50, 50, 100 would average out to a score of 60. In our system based on summative assessment a student who scored 50, 50, 50, 50, 100 would be credited with a 100 because they took the time to learn the information and demonstrated that by the end of the unit that they understood the objectives. This system rewards students who strive to understand and doesn't punish students who struggled at the beginning of a topic but ended up understanding everything.
What Does That Mean for Parents?
While daily work is important, I don't stress about the scores on daily work. For example, in math I keep a sheet for the unit and I just jot down names each day to check in on during the next assignment and help them. If students bring home a paper with more than two wrong it would be good for them to fix those problems, but I don't need them to turn it back in for a grade. I also am a big proponent of reteaching and reassessing when students don't achieve a three on a topic. I work hard to get all of my students to a three on every topic.
I wrote a lot of words tonight and I still don't know if I captured what I want to say. I am more concerned with students learning skills then I am that they never make a mistake on a worksheet. We will all work together to make sure your child is successful and has a great year in a stress free learning environment.